Ideally, if the whole world were to come under United States umbrella, the 'Deep State' and the 'trillion dollar every year'  military in America would have a major problem. They won't have a reason to exist. The military industrial complex would become irrelevant. 

That is one of the lessons America learnt from disintegration of Soviet Union. The world moved to free trade and eventually many countries now aspire to have a say in decision making process. This instead of a world where it was just US making decisions and everybody justifying it.

Russia

At one point in not too distant history, Putin’s Russia wanted to join NATO. “Russia is part of European culture. And I cannot imagine my own country in isolation from Europe and what we often call the civilised world. So it is hard for me to visualise NATO as an enemy,” said Putin, the country’s acting president in year 2000, three weeks before the election, which made him president.

Now, why this could not materialise needs to be understood. Russia joining NATO would have prevented America's leadership and absolute dominance in Europe. Unless America has enemy to point to, why would European nations band together behind Washington and purchase its weapons, while also integrating its economy closely. 

Years ago, Russian President Vladimir Putin delivered a landmark speech that challenged the European security framework many in his audience had worked to establish. Speaking at Munich's Bayerischer Hof in February 2007, Putin spent 30 minutes criticising the United States for fostering a unipolar world, asserting, “a world with one master, one sovereign.” He further described this system as ultimately “pernicious.”

While America understood and fuelled the insecurities of both Europe and Russia, it also began insisting on further expansion of NATO all the way to Ukraine. This with clear intent to drag Russia into yet another war to weaken it and perhaps disintegrate, thereby becoming manageable for America. 

The Western 'iron-clad' support for Ukraine came with presumption that America would be able to arm twist the whole of the world into compliance while cutting off Russia from global financial system ensuring its disintegration. Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas famously said that Russia's defeat is not necessarily a negative outcome, as it comprises many diverse nations. She added, "If larger powers become smaller, allowing smaller nations to emerge, it is not inherently a bad thing."

It is clear that if Russia could be broken up, all of its military industrial complex and natural resources would come under Washington's influence. So then it will be Washington alone calling the shots about US or Russian resources. How difficult would it be then to acquire a military base close to China? 

So America would have achieved global dominance once again while at the same time, still have an enemy to point to and this time it is China. Thus the American deep state expands and lessens competition but still stays relevant.

India

Uncle Sam's aims and objectives are no where close to being achieved in Russia and the blame is primarily on India and China as the two countries did not budge from their stand to continue their relations with Moscow. India appears to be on the target now. Well, here again, targeting India achieves multiple objectives for America.

For one, the 'America is Back' leader Joe Biden is being blamed for devastating war effort in Gaza but also in Lebanon. That America could not prevent what Muslims around the world describe as genocide, this resentment is further a problem for the US 'Deep State'. But what they have come to realise is that most of the Muslim population is residing in South Asia and that too in countries including Pakistan and Bangladesh. It is for this reason that a regime change has been brought about in Bangladesh.

Coz that would leave India engulfed in dealing with hostile countries on two sides and create enough news items of Hindu Muslim hostilities that American actions in West Asia gets less talked about and eventually forgotten. Then again, the repeated attempts to target Indian government and its corporates on charges of fraud or trans-national repression is to either bring about a change of government in India and thus compliance to the American demands or cut off India from Western finances and suffer reputational damage. 

Since India is not agreeing to joining NATO, militarising Quad or severing ties with Russia, all of which would mean India committing itself to become full-fledged American ally, it is only logical that the South Asian giant has to be cut to size. America is ramping its military production facilities, asking long term allies to invest equally and then forging alliances like AUKUS to enable submarine movement in Indo-Pacific. In time, it is quite likely that US and its allies would maintain credible sea force in Indian Ocean region, which India sees now as its backyard.      

The ruling BJP finally has gone ahead and now pointed fingers at the Antony Blinken headed US State Department for targeting India. The allegations were leveled after the visit of Donald Lu, the US Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia, to the country. The allegations emerged amid the speculations that US is looking to create a new country with territories carved out of India, Myanmar and Bangladesh. 

Since South Asia is now more troubled, the Indian efforts of trading in rupee instead of US dollar, especially in its own neighbourhood, may also suffer as a result. Bangladesh is doing everything in its power to hurt Indian interests. 

There is huge narrative being peddled in many parts of the global media that India is quite literally has troubled relations with all of its neighbours and this despite the 'neighbourhood first' approach. With this, India is staring at a difficult situation as the diaspora from hostile Pakistan and Bangladesh could over time create similar difficulties for Indians in Gulf countries as well.